Tuesday, June 30, 2015

COAS Casts a 2015 All Star Ballot

It's late June in another baseball season, Major League Baseball's All Star Game is right around the corner. With ballots coming due in a couple days, I need to vote. And I can actually do it closer to the deadline this year.

Major League Baseball has one of the more intriguing All Star Games, and also probably the most controversial. A ton of Kansas City Royals make up the American League team, something that has rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. My take: this system is set up to be abused like this. I personally don't like it, as my votes go for who I think deserves to go, but I don't begrudge people for ballot stuffing to get players on their favorite teams in.

Obviously, I will still take full advantage of being able to vote 35 times, but I'm voting in an honest fashion. The players I think deserve to make it get my vote. Simple as that. Let's get to it.

American League
1B: Miguel Cabrera (DET)
2B: Jose Altuve (HOU)
SS: Jose Iglesias (DET)
3B: Manny Machado (BAL)
C: Brian McCann (NYY)
DH: Nelson Cruz (SEA)
OF: Mike Trout (LAA)
OF: Yoenis Cespedes (DET)
OF: Brett Gardner (NYY)

Most of these picks were fairly obvious. Miggy is having another good year, Manny Machado has had a monster first half, as have Brian McCann and Nelson Cruz, and Mike Trout is Mike Trout. Jose Altuve was pretty obvious too, though from there it was tricky. Jose Iglesias doesn't have much pop, but is hitting well. Then at the back, Cespedes and Gardner both have good all around numbers and make for a well rounded lineup.


National League
1B: Paul Goldschmidt (ARI)
2B: Dee Gordon (MIA)
SS: Jhonny Peralta (STL)
3B: Nolan Arenado (COL)
C: Buster Posey (SF)
DH*: Anthony Rizzo (CHC)
OF: Bryce Harper (WAS)
OF: Norichika Aoki (SF)
OF: Andrew McCutchen (PIT)

Important note: the NL doesn't have a voting spot for a DH for obvious reasons, hence the asterisk. Since it's not an official vote, I'm allowing myself one homer vote for a Cub. Final side note: the designated hitter is for sissies. Anyway, Rizzo is in at DH because he shouldn't start at first over Goldschmidt, who has been amazing. Bryce Harper was the other automatic one before I even looked at numbers. From there, Nolan Arenado and Buster Posey were obvious choices, Dee Gordon felt like an "Eh, it'll work" vote at a shallow second base pool, Jhonny Peralta beat out Troy Tulowitzki, and I felt that Aoki and McCutchen were the best all around guys. I would have voted for Stanton, but as he's injured, it's a wasted vote.

The Official 2015 Confessions of a Sportscaster All Star Ballot
All of these were voted for 35 times, then another 70 times under my two other emails because why not. Most of these guys will probably not start. Odds are most, if not all, will end up playing in the All Star Game, however. That's good enough for me.

My hope still is that we have the seven Royals starting the All Star Game to force a change of some sort in the All Star Game format. I like the All Star voting; it gives the fans a choice of who they want to see play. If we keep that though, then the Game needs to go back to being an exhibition, and strictly so. No more home field advantage in the World Series. It was an interesting idea, but it allows players on teams who won't sniff the playoffs to impact the playoffs. I don't like that. Take it back to an exhibition and we're good.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

2015 NBA Tournament of Champions Preview

Two summers ago, I undertook a major project. It was probably the biggest project I've done with Confessions of a Sportscaster. Now, with the Golden State Warriors being crowned the new NBA Champions after knocking off the undermanned Cleveland Cavaliers, I'm going back to the hardwood and doing it all again.

2013's edition of the NBA Tournament of Champions was a straight up single-elimination tournament. I figured it was the easiest way to go through and find our best team of all time. However, I ran into a couple flaws. I found a cutoff to make it a successful 64 team field, at least in theory. However, WhatIfSports, my simulator, only went as far back as 1952. I worked around it as best as I could, but I want to make sure that all 64 participants are available. This time, they are.

The other flaw I had was with half of the field dropping out immediately due to the single-elimination nature of that tournament. Part of this is me mourning the 1992 Bulls getting bounced in Round 1 by the 2012 Miami Heat. Many other teams saw their chances end early, including quite a few first round sweeps. I want to avoid that this time, so we're changing the format.

This time, we're going to try this in a similar fashion to the World Cup. The last 64 NBA champions, from the 1952 Minneapolis Lakers through this year's champion, were seeded from 1 through 64 because originally, I was going to go back to the single elimination format. Instead, I'm going to split the 64 team field into eight groups of eight teams apiece. These teams will play in a double round robin where the top four in each pool advance to a single-elimination best of seven tournament. I debated about doing a double elimination tournament, but I think it would end up being a logistical nightmare. This way still, each team will play a minimum of 14 games through the month of July.

So, to fill in each group, I'm going to use the seedings I had already made in an attempt to balance each pool out to some degree. For the 2013 Tournament of Champions, the field was randomly seeded. Since I have a baseline this time, it makes sense to balance the groups as best as possible. Each group will be filled randomly in the following fashion:
  • Pool A: Teams seeded 1-8 (made the Tournament of Champions Quarterfinals or further)- 1 team
  • Pool B: Teams seeded 9-16 (were eliminated in the Third Round)- 1 team
  • Pool C: Teams seeded 17-32 (were eliminated in the Second Round)- 2 teams
  • Pool D: Teams seeded 33-64 (were eliminated in the First Round/2014 Spurs/2015 Warriors)- 4 teams
With no baseline for the 2014 Spurs or the 2015 Warriors, they're getting put in the only pool that makes sense. Now, it's certainly possible that we'll see some interchange where some Pool D teams are better than teams in Pool C or even Pool B due to bad 2013 matchups, while Pool B or Pool C teams took advantage of older champions to advance as far as they did. This is an attempt to balance that out.

So, without further ado, here are the groups for the 2015 NBA Tournament of Champions:

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

One Goal Achieved

In 2010, I finished a swim between the third period and overtime of a hockey game played in Philadelphia and got out in time to see confusion from everyone except Patrick Kane as the Chicago Blackhawks won the Stanley Cup for the first time in 49 years. In 2013, I watched much of a sixth game played in Boston with Kristen at her parents' house, left late in the third period, and got to listen to 17 seconds before making it home in time to watch the final minute. In 2015, Kristen and I went out to hopefully watch history unfold... And it didn't disappoint.


Two months ago 16 teams began a journey for a legendary trophy. I went round by round and somehow only missed a single series prediction (Rangers over Caps) while getting to watch a lot of great hockey. Of course, like the last one, it wasn't easy.

There are, of course, plenty of moments that I'll end up throwing together into a YouTube playlist from this run. The classless policies of the Nashville Predators' ticket office drew the ire of Chicago, and they overcame a 3-0 first period deficit to win deep into the night. After Crawford got benched for the second time, concern rose, but the Hawks took care of business at home, including Brent Seabrook adding to his legend of overtime heroics. Finally, Crawford came back to relieve Scott Darling in a Game 6 clincher and the Hawks showed Nashville how a real hockey franchise operates. Hearing from Minnesota Wild fans sing the eternal praises of their deadline hero Devan Dubnyk did cause some concern, and yet the Hawks made it look like child's play. Then there were the Ducks. I kept it civil with KTLA's Tim Lynn, their helicopter reporter and avid Duck fan, even after the chaos of a bad Game 1 loss. I slept through the end of Game 2, missing out on Andrew Shaw's audition for the Chicago Fire and Marcus Kruger's heroics. I stayed up late for Game 4 to see deadline deal Antoine Vermette become a hero in Game 4. After losing a game in a series tied 2-2 for the first time in the era, I watched the Game 6 onslaught in the second period, and the total domination in Game 7 to send the goons Corey Perry and Ryan Kesler home sad.

This Tampa series though... man. I knew they were fast, and I figured they'd look insurmountable at times, but holy crap. They're a good hockey team. I wouldn't be surprised to see them win a Cup in the next couple years. They have a lot of firepower, good defense, and a good goaltender. Like Nashville though, I didn't like their ticket policies either, so there's a sense of justice in this win. Even so, what a series. Kristen went to bed early on the night of Game 1, but I stayed up to watch Teravainen and Vermette steal the Game 1 win. Games 2 and 3 were frustrating as the Hawks gave up third period goals to drop both, but Crawford was phenomenal in the final three games, and the Hawks' offense did just enough.

Last night though was fantastic. I was feeling it all day; I didn't want to get overconfident, but this Hawks team knows how to close out a series, and they had a chance to win on home ice. They didn't waste it. Crawford was absolutely phenomenal, but the bar was on edge all evening until finally Keith broke through.

People felt better, but with as tight a series as this was, we were all still nervous as the third period moved on. Time moves agonizingly slow in situations like this, but it felt so much better once Showtime broke through for the insurance tally.


Kristen couldn't have been happier. I've mentioned on here that she's not much of a sports nut, but the Hawks are the exception. That made last night all the more worth it. We got to celebrate, do a victory lap together around the bar with the Cup when time expired, and I feel like we were the most popular people in the bar afterwards, as everyone wanted to take a picture with our inflatable Cup. Kristen joked that we should have charged a dollar to everyone who wanted one.

These are the experiences you remember and take with you for a long time. And now, the morning after, the city continues to celebrate not just a championship... but a dynasty.

That last point is a little tricky, and in my running-on-four-hours-of-sleep state, needed a little thinking. The argument could go that calling this Hawks team a dynasty cheapens the word. That may be true, but sports have changed in the last few decades. The NHL has a salary cap now, and it's impossible to keep together full groups like the old Canadiens, the early 80's Islanders, or Gretzky's Oilers. Factoring that in, this Hawks team has to be a modern dynasty. The Red Wings had a "three Cups in six years" stretch, but the salary cap didn't exist yet. Now that it does, we've seen what's happened to the Hawks following their first two Cups and what is almost certain to happen after this one. To lost so many pieces of your team, and still be back year after year is amazing. This is a dynasty. And the best part? It's only just beginning.

Monday, June 1, 2015

2015 Stanley Cup Finals Preview

It's June of 2015, good has triumphed over evil, and there's a potential dynasty in the making.

By Game 7 fortunes, I was able to nail down the matchup of the 2015 Stanley Cup Final. We are thus rewarded with a treat of a matchup between two highly skilled teams that both had to overcome some hurdles to get to hockey's biggest stage.

Many people predicted this matchup a month and a half ago (myself included on the NHL's Bracket Challenge)... now it's here! Let's dig into it.

Chicago Blackhawks (beat ANA in seven) vs Tampa Bay Lightning (beat NYR in seven)
Teams split their season series (Blackhawks won in a shootout)

First, a little history. The Lightning have been in the NHL since the 1992-93 season. Much of their history is forgettable, as a majority of their time in the league hasn't resulted in a playoff berth. However, they had a magical 2003-04 season when they won the Stanley Cup, and in recent years, they have been building a young core reminiscent of that in Chicago in the latter part of the last decade and have the right structure in place to get here. They face the old guard, a Blackhawks team that has made the Western Conference Finals five times in the last seven years, now in their third Cup Final, with the honor of lifting Lord Stanley twice in that span.

Both teams had a difficult road to get this far. Tampa struggled in the first round against an always tough Detroit team, but were able to pull out a Game 7 win to advance. They then were able to knock out two of the best goaltenders in the league in Montreal's Carey Price and New York's Henrik Lundqvist, at times making both look like minor leaguers with barrages of goals. The Blackhawks, meanwhile, overcame an early 3-0 deficit in their first playoff game as well as a goalie controversy to knock out Nashville in six games, got a surprising sweep of the Minnesota Wild to shut up all the talk about Devan Dubnyk, then despite relying heavily on their top four defensemen, outlasting a physical (sometimes to the point of dirty) Ducks team to become the third straight team to eliminate them in Anaheim in Game 7 after the Ducks led the series three games to two.

I had mentioned before the last round about the early struggles of Steven Stamkos, who failed to score in the first eight games of the playoffs, and having just three through two rounds. He added four goals and three assists to bring his playoff point total to 17 for the year... and that's only the third best mark on the squad. Tyler Johnson continues his hot play (12 goals and nine assists in 20 games), while his mates on the "Triplets Line" have also excelled: Nikita Kucherov has 19 points (nine goals and 10 assists) and Ondrej Palat has 15 (seven goals and eight assists). Stamkos has no slouches as his linemates either, with Valtteri Filppula and Alex Killorn are also in double figures. They also boast an elite defenseman in Victor Hedman, who has ten points and is a +11 for the playoffs. Goaltender Ben Bishop struggled a bit against the Rangers, seeing his save percentage drop to a .920, but he's allowing just a 2.15 goals against average, so he has been very, very good.

It's fun to see those numbers, because the Blackhawks are pretty similar. Chicago also has seven skaters with at least 10 points on the playoffs, only they are led by the guy you expect to lead them. Patrick Kane struggled a bit early in the Ducks series, but came alive as the series went deeper, and his 10 goals and 10 assists give him 20 points to lead the way. Jonathan Toews hasn't always scored goals with regularity in the playoffs, but he has nine to go along with nine assists to tie for second. Those are the bulk goal-scorers, though Brandon Saad picked up the pace a little bit against Anaheim with his breakaway speed leading to a couple big early goals in Chicago wins. In something of a "desperation mode", Joel Quenneville made these guys the top line for the final two games, and they did not disappoint, destroying Anaheim's top line. The bigger talk for Chicago has been its defense, in particular Duncan Keith, who leads all defensemen with 18 playoff points (including 16 assists) and a whopping +13 while logging copious minutes. Brent Seabrook has also been his usual effective self (six goals, four assists, +6). Meanwhile, after the first round hiccups, Corey Crawford has returned to his solid form with a .919 save percentage, even though his goals against average is still kind of high at 2.56.

Both teams boast great speed and elite scorers, so both Bishop and Crawford may see their numbers decline a bit. The Blackhawks have faced some tough offenses (Anaheim in particular), though it could be argued that Tampa is better. Meanwhile, the Lightning really haven't faced the kind of offensive threat that the Hawks can bring to the table. To reverse it though, the Hawks still have some concerns with defensive depth. Their top four of Keith, Seabrook, Niklas Hjalmarsson and Johnny Oduya have played a ton of minutes to cover up the rotating cast at five and six. Kyle Cumiskey did well in limited time in the last six games, and Quenneville replaced veteran Kimmo Timonen, who looked lost and out of shape at times with David Rundblad for the final two games (though Rundblad dressed for Game 1 to replace the injured Michal Rozsival). Even as a Hawks fan, I have to wonder how much the Hawks defense has left in the tank, though Duncan Keith is clearly some sort of cyborg sent to secure the dynasty's place in history. That lack of defensive depth is still a concern, especially against a team like the Lightning who can score at will. Going the other way though, most of this core for the Lightning haven't been to this stage before (there are a few former Rangers who played in last year's Cup Final, and Filppula won the Cup with Detroit some time back), and they're going against a proven champion who has already shown resiliency night in and night out.

The Lightning will give the Hawks some fits. But ultimately, I think there's too much experience for the Hawks. Bishop has had some off games, something he can't afford to do against an offense of this level. We'll probably see at least a couple overtime games, because that's what happens this time of year, and the Lightning will look great, if not insurmountable at times. However, I refuse to count out the heart of a champion. Make it three in six years, and this time... the party can kick off at the Madhouse with 22,000-plus delirious fans screaming in delight as The Captain hoists the toughest trophy in all of sports to win. Blackhawks in six.